In the example of Common Law Robbery, what element did Matt use against Eric?

In the context of Common Law Robbery, the element of intimidation is crucial because robbery inherently involves the use of threats or coercive means to take property from another person. When Matt used intimidation against Eric, he likely instilled fear or apprehension, making Eric feel as though he had no choice but to comply with Matt's demands. This aligns with the fundamental principle of robbery, which distinguishes it from theft; robbery requires the element of force or intimidation to directly affect the victim and accomplish the unlawful taking.

While physical contact may sometimes be involved in robbery, it is not a necessary component; intimidation can be sufficient on its own to fulfill the requirements of the offense. Theft without any threats cannot be classified as robbery, and legal authority does not apply here, as it does not relate to the context of committing robbery. Therefore, intimidation is the key element that allows the act to qualify as robbery under Common Law.