In the example of felonious restraint, how does the perpetrator restrict the victim?

In the context of felonious restraint, the act involves unlawfully restricting someone’s freedom of movement. The correct answer highlights a specific method of confinement where the perpetrator physically obstructs the victim's ability to leave a given space, such as a vehicle. This action directly limits the victim’s freedom to move and escape the situation, fulfilling the legal definition of restraint.

The other options, while potentially related to situations involving coercion or control, do not encapsulate the core legal element of "restraint" in the same manner. Physically binding someone or using physical force suggests a more invasive level of control, while verbally threatening does not involve physical restriction at all. Therefore, blocking an exit directly aligns with the concept of felonious restraint, as it limits a person's mobility without necessarily resorting to physical binding or force.