When is a person considered to be falsely imprisoned?

A person is considered to be falsely imprisoned when they are intentionally restrained without their consent. This definition underscores the element of intention by the individual imposing the restraint and the absence of the victim's consent. False imprisonment centers around the unlawful confinement of a person, meaning the individual is kept from moving freely without legal justification or their agreement.

In scenarios such as being detained with the intent to commit theft, while there may be a presence of unlawful restraint, the primary focus is on the intent related to the criminal act rather than the act of false imprisonment itself. Holding someone for ransom does not constitute false imprisonment unless there is an element of confinement against the will of that person. Being escorted from one room to another typically involves consent unless there is coercion or threat involved, which changes the nature of the interaction and could lead to a false imprisonment claim. Thus, the key component of intentional restraint without consent makes the second choice the definition of false imprisonment.